Author Topic: The prince and the paedophile  (Read 21840 times)

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64166
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #25 on: November 17, 2019, 08:43:41 AM »
Andrew has brought the monarchy into disrepute and should step down from public life, imo. >:(
Think it needs properly investigated by the police. Your suggestion above just sounds like a cover up

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7982
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #26 on: November 17, 2019, 09:04:31 AM »
Think it needs properly investigated by the police. Your suggestion above just sounds like a cover up

If the police aren't looking into it, they should be doing so. No Royal should be above the law of the land.
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

wigginhall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17730
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #27 on: November 17, 2019, 09:53:19 AM »
I had to laugh at the story about eating pizza.   As wags are saying, no, I don't remember seeing young girls in the house, but I remember how good that pizza tasted in Woking.  I can recommend Pizza Express.

Another journalist joke, we have to posthumously forgive Diana, she only did the second worst royal interview in history.
« Last Edit: November 17, 2019, 10:02:26 AM by wigginhall »
They were the footprints of a gigantic hound!

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #28 on: November 17, 2019, 11:34:29 AM »
Andrew has brought the monarchy into disrepute and should step down from public life, imo. >:(
     





Nope.
He's simply scraped the veneer of the bling and returned this less than respectable shower tothe time of their disreputable Hanovarian ancestors.
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7982
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #29 on: November 17, 2019, 11:36:21 AM »
I view the Queen in high esteem, she has done very good job for this country.
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11070
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #30 on: November 17, 2019, 11:41:18 AM »
I view the Queen in high esteem, she has done very good job for this country.

Am I missing something here?

Isn't Andrew the Queens son?

Does she hold no responsibility for the way he turned out?
Before we work on Artificial Intelligence shouldn't we address the problem of natural stupidity.

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #31 on: November 17, 2019, 11:42:00 AM »
I view the Queen in high esteem, she has done very good job for this country.
   
Oh, dear.
 

Her favourite sprog showed last night why bowihng and scraping to someone because mummy and daddy had sex in the right bed is simply daft.
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7982
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #32 on: November 17, 2019, 11:43:05 AM »
   
Oh, dear.
 

Her favourite sprog showed last night why bowihng and scraping to someone because mummy and daddy had sex in the right bed is simply daft.

What a daft comment! ::)
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11070
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #33 on: November 17, 2019, 11:44:50 AM »
What a daft comment! ::)

I'll say this for you, you certainly know how to bring out my republican tendencies!
Before we work on Artificial Intelligence shouldn't we address the problem of natural stupidity.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64166
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #34 on: November 17, 2019, 11:47:17 AM »
What a daft comment! ::)
Would you go to someone to have your teeth fixed because their mother was a dentist?

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7982
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #35 on: November 17, 2019, 11:51:31 AM »
Quite frankly I really don't know what you lot are on about. Andrew is an stupid idiot and if he did sexually molest that girl he should be prosecuted.
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

SweetPea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2669
  • John 8:32
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #36 on: November 17, 2019, 12:02:27 PM »
And one of those times when a bad offense is an awful defense


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-50446392/prince-andrew-on-epstein-there-was-no-indication

Paraphrasing but "A toe massage,me? Really?"..... "A playboy when I was younger? Where on earth did that idea come form?"

If he is so sure of his innocence why isn't he suing?

Cringe, cringe and more cringe….

For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power and of love and of a sound mind ~ 2 Timothy 1:7

SteveH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10358
  • God? She's black.
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #37 on: November 17, 2019, 12:57:36 PM »
Am I missing something here?

Isn't Andrew the Queens son?

Does she hold no responsibility for the way he turned out?
Not necessarily, no. Andrew is an adult, who made his own decisions.
When conspiracy nuts start spouting their bollocks, the best answer is "That's what they want you to think".

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #38 on: November 17, 2019, 02:17:58 PM »
What a daft comment! ::)
 

In what way?
Why is Elizabeth not the3 second wortthy od deferenxce, elevation, rank, style, title or worship by the gullable?
Why is she 'queen', if not by result of her mummy and daddy having sex in the right bed?


"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7982
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #39 on: November 17, 2019, 02:25:36 PM »
 

In what way?
Why is Elizabeth not the3 second wortthy od deferenxce, elevation, rank, style, title or worship by the gullable?
Why is she 'queen', if not by result of her mummy and daddy having sex in the right bed?

I still have no idea what you are on about. I have said my say and won't post on this thread again, so don't bother to reply.
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #40 on: November 17, 2019, 02:31:47 PM »
I still have no idea what you are on about. I have said my say and won't post on this thread again, so don't bother to reply.
   


Ah....so, no answer, then.
What a surprise.
No-one with half a brain defers to someone because of genetics, surely?
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64166
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #41 on: November 17, 2019, 05:18:55 PM »
Various statements from journalists that they sat on the story due to threats from the Palace. Deeply disturbing if true.

Gordon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18256
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #42 on: November 17, 2019, 08:18:01 PM »
The exploits of this arsehole illustrate why we should be rid of the anachronistic and distasteful monarchy, along with all their aristocratic hangers-on.


Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11070
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #44 on: November 18, 2019, 08:26:17 AM »
This


https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/18042832.kirsty-strickland-prince-andrews-car-crash-interview-exposes-fault-line-britains-power-structures/

A good article. How anyone can believe Prince Andrew, and by extension give the benefit of the doubt to the creaking institution that is the monarchy, is beyond me.
Before we work on Artificial Intelligence shouldn't we address the problem of natural stupidity.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32431
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #45 on: November 18, 2019, 09:32:45 AM »
Isn't Andrew the Queens son?

Does she hold no responsibility for the way he turned out?

In law we generally don't hold people responsible for what their relatives do. Even Brady and Hindley's parents didn't face trial from bringing up murderers.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Outrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14553
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #46 on: November 18, 2019, 09:40:48 AM »
The exploits of this arsehole illustrate why we should be rid of the anachronistic and distasteful monarchy, along with all their aristocratic hangers-on.

Unless you can somehow demonstrate that this arsehole (no argument with that characterisation, by the way) is the arsehole he is specifically because of his status within the monarchy and not, say, the sort of embedded privelege that gives us the similarly rectally-infused Boris Johnson, then it's not an argument against the monarchy per se.

I think there are enough arguments against the monarchy in its own right without trying to lump this particular vomit-inducing incident to the mix.

O.
Universes are forever, not just for creation...

New Atheism - because, apparently, there's a use-by date on unanswered questions.

Eminent Pedant, Interpreter of Heretical Writings, Unwarranted Harvester of Trite Nomenclature, Church of Debatable Saints

Gordon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18256
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #47 on: November 18, 2019, 11:40:24 AM »
Unless you can somehow demonstrate that this arsehole (no argument with that characterisation, by the way) is the arsehole he is specifically because of his status within the monarchy and not, say, the sort of embedded privelege that gives us the similarly rectally-infused Boris Johnson, then it's not an argument against the monarchy per se.

I think there are enough arguments against the monarchy in its own right without trying to lump this particular vomit-inducing incident to the mix.

O.

Indeed, which is why I used the term 'illustrates': had this particular arsehole not been a member of the monarchy, and did not have the profile that accompanies that status, then we would treat him as any other common or garden arsehole would be treated.

His reputation for self-aggrandisement, and as 'air-miles Andy', is well known and he was described on R4 earlier, by a journalist who had personally interviewed him, as being not the sharpest chisel in the tool-box and one who over-estimates his intellect, which suggests he would make a great Dunning-Kruger case study. My point being that this arsehole does seem of limited ability yet he has enjoyed life-long status and privilege simply because of who his mother is, which for me illustrates just one example of why the monarchy is offensively dysfunctional and needs to be dispensed with.     

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32431
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #48 on: November 18, 2019, 11:43:09 AM »
Indeed, which is why I used the term 'illustrates': had this particular arsehole not been a member of the monarchy, and did not have the profile that accompanies that status, then we would treat him as any other common or garden arsehole would be treated.

His reputation for self-aggrandisement, and as 'air-miles Andy', is well known and he was described on R4 earlier, by a journalist who had personally interviewed him, as being not the sharpest chisel in the tool-box and one who over-estimates his intellect, which suggests he would make a great Dunning-Kruger case study. My point being that this arsehole does seem of limited ability yet he has enjoyed life-long status and privilege simply because of who his mother is, which for me illustrates just one example of why the monarchy is offensively dysfunctional and needs to be dispensed with.   
In what way are you treating him differently to any other arsehole?

It seem to me that you are using his behaviour as a means to grind an axe.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Gordon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18256
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #49 on: November 18, 2019, 11:47:17 AM »
In what way are you treating him differently to any other arsehole?

It seem to me that you are using his behaviour as a means to grind an axe.

I think when it comes to both him and the monarchy there are good reasons for a spot of axe-grinding.