Author Topic: The prince and the paedophile  (Read 21690 times)

SteveH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10352
  • God? She's black.
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #250 on: March 25, 2022, 10:27:52 AM »
Mods - please lock this thread, before we alll die of boredom!
When conspiracy nuts start spouting their bollocks, the best answer is "That's what they want you to think".

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11070
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #251 on: March 25, 2022, 10:30:28 AM »
Tempting Steve, but then the same could be said of other threads (from my pov) and then where would we be.
Before we work on Artificial Intelligence shouldn't we address the problem of natural stupidity.

Maeght

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5675
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #252 on: March 25, 2022, 07:09:21 PM »
So this means that until the original photo with the negative is produced, we cannot say conclusively whether it is genuine or not.
Although perhaps (in my view) there is cause to believe it is not, if we agree that there are certain anomalies such as Andrew's finger and his and Ghislaine's trousers (where are the pockets?)
I edited my previous post, as I took another photo of a window at night in which the flash appeared in the image.

No. As I have said, it depends on the exact lighting conditions also. Don't want to just keep repeating myself (that's boring!) so will leave it there. You are of course entitled to your view but you did claim there was glaring evidence and that is what I was addressing (or trying to). There isn't any - just anomalies which can't be taken as evidence without doing a comparison under the exact same lighting conditions, with the same camera and with the same copying having been done, and seeing that the same anomalies don't occur.

Spud

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7127
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #253 on: March 28, 2022, 06:19:50 PM »
Mods - please lock this thread, before we alll die of boredom!
Not when the evidence for Andrew's innocence is starting to mount up! Sorry to bore you again, but I found another Twitter member who thinks that Ghislaine looks older in the photo with Virginia than she does in other pictures from around 2001. Compare the photo with this one from 2001.

And I also found this statement from Ghislaine herself in 2020:
Quote
Giuffre, who wore a low-cut, belly-baring pink tank top and purple iridescent hip huggers in the snap, says the image was taken after Maxwell took her shopping — but the British socialite said the image must be fake because she wouldn’t be caught dead purchasing such an outfit.

“I would never — the outfit doesn’t work at all so,” Maxwell retorted in the 2016 deposition, while seeming to channel her inner Regina George from the 2004 flick “Mean Girls.”

She then reiterated, “I did not take her shopping.”

Maeght

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5675
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #254 on: March 28, 2022, 07:26:31 PM »
Not when the evidence for Andrew's innocence is starting to mount up! Sorry to bore you again, but I found another Twitter member who thinks that Ghislaine looks older in the photo with Virginia than she does in other pictures from around 2001. Compare the photo with this one from 2001.

And I also found this statement from Ghislaine herself in 2020:

What a twitter member thinks isn't evidence. But I was leaving it wasn't I? ..........
« Last Edit: March 28, 2022, 07:33:37 PM by Maeght »

Spud

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7127
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #255 on: March 28, 2022, 08:28:43 PM »

ProfessorDavey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17540
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #256 on: March 29, 2022, 09:24:31 AM »
Maxwell claims Virginia lied
Hmm - you mean Maxwell the person recently convicted of five out of six very serious charges including sex trafficking. And the same person who is facing a second criminal trial for perjury on two charges that she lied under oath during a civil suit in 2015 about Epstein's abuse of underage girls.

Not really sure she can be relied upon to be telling the truth.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64141
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #257 on: June 02, 2022, 08:17:24 PM »
.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64141
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #258 on: June 02, 2022, 09:55:23 PM »
.

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #259 on: June 03, 2022, 09:11:30 AM »
.
Can't see the screenshot, presumably it mentions mummy's little soldier's political covid?
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64141
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #260 on: June 03, 2022, 10:55:39 AM »
Can't see the screenshot, presumably it mentions mummy's little soldier's political covid?

Of the 2 screenshots, one is someone noting that ot's good to hear something positive about Prince Andrew, followed by a reply that he was getting a note from his mum, and a further reply that he's already been given twelve million of our notes from her.

The second notes that as he has tested positive we can tell Covid is still in the schools.

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #261 on: June 03, 2022, 12:34:23 PM »
Of the 2 screenshots, one is someone noting that ot's good to hear something positive about Prince Andrew, followed by a reply that he was getting a note from his mum, and a further reply that he's already been given twelve million of our notes from her.

The second notes that as he has tested positive we can tell Covid is still in the schools.
   
Ah: thanks, NS.
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

Spud

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7127
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #262 on: June 14, 2022, 08:53:19 AM »
Hmm - you mean Maxwell the person recently convicted of five out of six very serious charges including sex trafficking. And the same person who is facing a second criminal trial for perjury on two charges that she lied under oath during a civil suit in 2015 about Epstein's abuse of underage girls.

Not really sure she can be relied upon to be telling the truth.
So we can't rely on Giuffre to be telling the truth either, as she willingly trafficked underage girls for Epstein.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64141
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #263 on: September 15, 2022, 08:40:02 PM »
.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64141
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #264 on: September 19, 2022, 07:41:39 PM »
.

Spud

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7127
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #265 on: October 17, 2022, 08:19:39 AM »

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11070
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #266 on: October 17, 2022, 08:37:57 AM »
Ghislaine claims photo is a fake

The gist of this is that a woman who was sentenced to 20 years in federal prison for carrying out a years-long scheme with her longtime confidante Jeffrey Epstein to groom and sexually abuse underage girls changed her initial story.

Convincing.
Before we work on Artificial Intelligence shouldn't we address the problem of natural stupidity.

ProfessorDavey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17540
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #267 on: October 17, 2022, 09:36:44 AM »

Spud

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7127
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #268 on: October 17, 2022, 02:27:58 PM »
The gist .... changed her initial story.
She says her initial meaning was that she recognized the house as hers and thought the photo was real. Maybe she's had time to study the photo more, as she says there are things wrong with it and no original.

Spud

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7127
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #269 on: January 22, 2023, 06:11:38 PM »
Ghislaine has been interviewed by Jeremy Kyle, it will be shown on Talk TV tomorrow at 7pm.

Gordon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18254
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #270 on: January 22, 2023, 08:30:37 PM »
Ghislaine has been interviewed by Jeremy Kyle, it will be shown on Talk TV tomorrow at 7pm.

I'll give it a miss thanks.

SteveH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10352
  • God? She's black.
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #271 on: January 23, 2023, 02:09:29 PM »
Prince Andrew is writing his autobiography. It'll be available as a PDF file.
When conspiracy nuts start spouting their bollocks, the best answer is "That's what they want you to think".

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64141
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #272 on: January 28, 2023, 10:59:24 AM »
Utterly bizarre



Spud

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7127
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #273 on: January 31, 2023, 03:01:48 PM »
Utterly bizarre
It is indeed, but I have a feeling the photo might be a Mick-take of the fake Giuffre photo.

On Lorraine (ITV) last week, Victoria Harvey said she believes she knows the person who made the 2001 photo. Also that she has been in Maxwell's house and the geometry is not the same as it is on the picture.
https://youtu.be/qr8_mw6qjrg

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64141
Re: The prince and the paedophile
« Reply #274 on: January 31, 2023, 03:16:14 PM »
It is indeed, but I have a feeling the photo might be a Mick-take of the fake Giuffre photo.

On Lorraine (ITV) last week, Victoria Harvey said she believes she knows the person who made the 2001 photo. Also that she has been in Maxwell's house and the geometry is not the same as it is on the picture.
https://youtu.be/qr8_mw6qjrg
So you think that the Telegraph gave its headline and half the front page to a mickey-take?