Author Topic: The Torygraph publishing inaccurate rubbish (surely not!).  (Read 855 times)

SteveH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10402
  • God? She's black.
I have a pet termite. His name is Clint. Clint eats wood.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32500
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: The Torygraph publishing inaccurate rubbish (surely not!).
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2019, 11:20:43 AM »
An article about banning the burka is illustrated with a photo of a woman wearing a niqab.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/01/british-public-back-a-ban-on-burqa-by-two-to-one-poll-finds/?fbclid=IwAR0WQLzddFcjeXRM-OKAfzoJMiL7wl727eIxklEg8oTiAF5Xprmz1saZTX0
Well the photo only shows the woman's (I assume it is a woman) head. It could be either a burqa or a niqab.

I was more concerned about the idea of banning the burkini which would be totally ridiculous.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

SteveH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10402
  • God? She's black.
Re: The Torygraph publishing inaccurate rubbish (surely not!).
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2019, 11:26:14 AM »
It's a niqab. It is not a burka.  The second photo here shows burkas. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-38574457
I have a pet termite. His name is Clint. Clint eats wood.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32500
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: The Torygraph publishing inaccurate rubbish (surely not!).
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2019, 11:34:56 AM »
It's a niqab. It is not a burka.  The second photo here shows burkas. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-38574457

OK. Accepted.

The effect seems to be about the same though.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Christine

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 221
Re: The Torygraph publishing inaccurate rubbish (surely not!).
« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2019, 12:57:51 PM »
Given the Telegraph pays Boris Johnson, we should be grateful they didn't illustrate the piece with a picture of a letter box.

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7989
Re: The Torygraph publishing inaccurate rubbish (surely not!).
« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2019, 01:46:33 PM »
The Telegraph has always been an unpleasant newspaper, imo.
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

Walter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4463
Re: The Torygraph publishing inaccurate rubbish (surely not!).
« Reply #6 on: November 13, 2019, 02:45:26 PM »
Given the Telegraph pays Boris Johnson, we should be grateful they didn't illustrate the piece with a picture of a letter box.
" letter box" is a fitting description , we all know what it means 👍

Christine

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 221
Re: The Torygraph publishing inaccurate rubbish (surely not!).
« Reply #7 on: November 13, 2019, 03:55:48 PM »
" letter box" is a fitting description , we all know what it means 👍

I was being disparaging about both the PM and the Telegraph, did that not come across?  I obviously need to be more explicit.

Currently I'm wearing clothes outside that cover me from head to toe, with a waterproof jacket zipped up to my nose and the hood up, so only my eyes are visible.  Would I still be allowed to dress that way if burkas were banned?  I wonder how the clothing would be described in a law designed to tell women what they can and can't wear in public.  If such a law was enacted I would be keen to test it with a variety of garments that have the same practical effect as burkas, as well as perhaps trying out a burka myself.  I wonder if they'd prosecute an atheist in a burka?

Obviously, anyone should be willing to uncover their face for reasonable security reasons.  Other than that, it's nobody else's business what I wear.

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7989
Re: The Torygraph publishing inaccurate rubbish (surely not!).
« Reply #8 on: November 13, 2019, 04:08:07 PM »
I was being disparaging about both the PM and the Telegraph, did that not come across?  I obviously need to be more explicit.

Currently I'm wearing clothes outside that cover me from head to toe, with a waterproof jacket zipped up to my nose and the hood up, so only my eyes are visible.  Would I still be allowed to dress that way if burkas were banned?  I wonder how the clothing would be described in a law designed to tell women what they can and can't wear in public.  If such a law was enacted I would be keen to test it with a variety of garments that have the same practical effect as burkas, as well as perhaps trying out a burka myself.  I wonder if they'd prosecute an atheist in a burka?

Obviously, anyone should be willing to uncover their face for reasonable security reasons.  Other than that, it's nobody else's business what I wear.

I think I heard that  in some stores people are not permitted to wear hoodies.
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

Walter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4463
Re: The Torygraph publishing inaccurate rubbish (surely not!).
« Reply #9 on: November 13, 2019, 04:21:53 PM »
Christine
Nope , no need I understood what you meant 👍

However , if the government want to be clear they could put the relevant pics in news papers with captions
" these items of clothing are banned"

Easy ! 
« Last Edit: November 13, 2019, 04:24:09 PM by Walter »

Robbie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7512
Re: The Torygraph publishing inaccurate rubbish (surely not!).
« Reply #10 on: November 13, 2019, 07:34:11 PM »
Steven you are right, it is a picture of a niqab.
How often do we in the UK see people wearing a niqab? Hardly ever. We see burkas sometimes.
I don't believe in banning types of clothing, that's ridiculous and wonder where it would all end.

Given the Telegraph pays Boris Johnson, we should be grateful they didn't illustrate the piece with a picture of a letter box.

Quite!
True Wit is Nature to Advantage drest,
          What oft was Thought, but ne’er so well Exprest

SteveH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10402
  • God? She's black.
Re: The Torygraph publishing inaccurate rubbish (surely not!).
« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2019, 10:02:16 AM »
Steven you are right, it is a picture of a niqab.
How often do we in the UK see people wearing a niqab? Hardly ever. We see burkas sometimes.
I don't believe in banning types of clothing, that's ridiculous and wonder where it would all end.

Quite!
I've seen niqabs; not in Hemel, wherte I live, where there are quite a few Muslims but not of the more conservative type, but in parts of London, especially Edgeware Road, which runs through the middle of a large Muslim community. I've never seen a burka.
I have a pet termite. His name is Clint. Clint eats wood.