hmm. on the whole she was good at her job - putting a gloss on Boris' lies and misdirection.
Not sure she was - don't forget that she was originally brought in to front daily press conferences - that never happened, presumably because she simply wasn't good enough to fulfil that role. You may ask therefore how she got the job - the fact that she is a chum (or is that chum-ess) of Sunak and Carrie Symonds couldn't possibly have anything to do with why she was appointed, could it
.
And, though one could feel sorry at her tearful statement, she didn't speak the truth about what she knew about rule breaking at No 10. It was just a bit of PR, getting her out of the issue.
A classic case of being sorry for getting caught, rather than being sorry for what she did.
And of course the dry-run press conference, as jaw droopingly appalling as it was, isn't really the issue here. The issue is the illegal party held at no10 that precipitated the need to plan for what to say when the press got hold of the story.