« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 136 137 [138] 139 140 ... 208   Go Down

Author Topic: Coronavirus  (Read 240331 times)

ad_orientem

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7900
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3425 on: November 24, 2020, 12:06:07 PM »
Quote from: Beyoncé Castle on November 24, 2020, 11:20:37 AM
Anti-anti-vaccinator* petition.
*I refuse to call them "anti-vaxxers", because that's what they want to be called: they think that giving themselves an eccentrically-spelled abbreviation normalises them.

Twats, the lot of them.
Logged
Peace through superior firepower.
Do not believe anything until the Kremlin denies it.

ad_orientem

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7900
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3426 on: November 24, 2020, 08:49:20 PM »
Some dickhead on Twitter wrote "Covic is one big lie". I couldn't help myself and answered "Covic? Isn't he a tennis player?"

Though my Twitter profile is mainly about football, especially West Ham, sometimes I'll reply to idiots in the political sphere. Today I wrote a few. Some serious and sarcastic. You can see my profile here (or if you're just curious to see what I look like).

https://mobile.twitter.com/pauljk75
« Last Edit: November 24, 2020, 09:05:04 PM by ad_orientem »
Logged
Peace through superior firepower.
Do not believe anything until the Kremlin denies it.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63724
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3427 on: November 24, 2020, 08:58:37 PM »
Quote from: ad_orientem on November 24, 2020, 08:49:20 PM
Some dickhead on Twitter wrote "Covic is one big lie". I couldn't help myself and answered "Covic? Isn't he a tennis player?"
My hat is doffed
Logged

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63724
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3428 on: November 25, 2020, 07:12:49 PM »
Logged

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63724
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3429 on: November 25, 2020, 07:36:43 PM »
Trail of incompetency, bits of corruption


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55061183
Logged

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63724
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3430 on: November 26, 2020, 07:44:29 AM »
Logged

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63724
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3431 on: November 26, 2020, 08:35:30 AM »

And the impact on women and unpaid care work

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-55016842
Logged

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32230
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3432 on: November 26, 2020, 01:25:58 PM »
Looks like there are questions over the claims made for the Oxford vaccine

https://www.ft.com/content/4583fbf8-b47c-4e78-8253-22efcfa4903a

In particular, their claim for 90% effective with the 1/2 dose and full dose treatment is questionable.
Logged
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63724
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3433 on: November 26, 2020, 07:31:42 PM »
While net worth does not mean cash in hand, the following stat is mind boggling: If Jeff Bezos gave every Amazon employee $105,000, then he would worth the same as he was pre Covid.
Logged

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63724
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3434 on: November 26, 2020, 11:05:46 PM »
Logged

SusanDoris

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8265
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3435 on: November 27, 2020, 06:52:08 AM »
Logged
The Most Honourable Sister of Titular Indecision.

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7970
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3436 on: November 27, 2020, 10:46:53 AM »
CRAZY!  >:(
Logged
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63724
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3437 on: November 27, 2020, 11:38:22 AM »
Logged

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10962
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3438 on: November 27, 2020, 11:59:40 AM »
Logged
Before we work on Artificial Intelligence shouldn't we address the problem of natural stupidity.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63724
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3439 on: November 27, 2020, 12:05:07 PM »
Logged

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10962
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3440 on: November 27, 2020, 12:57:00 PM »
Is there no end to their bullshittery?
Logged
Before we work on Artificial Intelligence shouldn't we address the problem of natural stupidity.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32230
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3441 on: November 27, 2020, 01:03:18 PM »
Quote from: Trentvoyager on November 27, 2020, 12:57:00 PM
Is there no end to their bullshittery?
Yes the Huffington Post is absolutely full of it.
Logged
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Sriram

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8243
    • Spirituality & Science
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3442 on: November 27, 2020, 02:05:37 PM »
Quote from: Nearly Sane on November 27, 2020, 12:05:07 PM
Wtf!


https://m.huffingtonpost.co.uk/amp/entry/oxford-university-astrazeneca-vaccine-uk-flag-union-jack_uk_5fbfdd14c5b68ca87f827a0e/?ncid=other_twitter_cooo9wqtham&utm_campaign=share_twitter&__twitter_impression=true


But why? Though the Oxford vaccine was highly regarded and was one of the front runners in the race...it has had severe problems.  Pfizer and Moderna have beaten it to the post.

Also, there is  considerable confusion on whether its efficacy is 62% or 90 % or what  exactly.  There seems to have been some mistake on the doses given to some people which thereby brought out the higher efficacy. All very uncertain.

They plan to redo the trials I think.

Logged

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63724
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3443 on: November 27, 2020, 02:06:15 PM »
Logged

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63724
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3444 on: November 27, 2020, 02:07:11 PM »
Quote from: Sriram on November 27, 2020, 02:05:37 PM

But why? Though the Oxford vaccine was highly regarded and was one of the front runners in the race...it has had severe problems.  Pfizer and Moderna have beaten it to the post.

Also, there is  considerable confusion on whether its efficacy is 62% or 90 % or what  exactly.  There seems to have been some mistake on the doses given to some people which thereby brought out the higher efficacy. All very uncertain.

They plan to redo the trials I think.
I think the request predates the issues with the results
Logged

Sriram

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8243
    • Spirituality & Science
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3445 on: November 27, 2020, 02:14:41 PM »
Quote from: Nearly Sane on November 27, 2020, 02:07:11 PM
I think the request predates the issues with the results

Well...ok.  They will probably withdraw the request in a hurry.....
Logged

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32230
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3446 on: November 27, 2020, 07:46:41 PM »
Logged
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32230
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3447 on: November 27, 2020, 07:48:43 PM »
Quote from: Sriram on November 27, 2020, 02:05:37 PM

But why? Though the Oxford vaccine was highly regarded and was one of the front runners in the race...it has had severe problems.  Pfizer and Moderna have beaten it to the post.

Also, there is  considerable confusion on whether its efficacy is 62% or 90 % or what  exactly.  There seems to have been some mistake on the doses given to some people which thereby brought out the higher efficacy. All very uncertain.

They plan to redo the trials I think.
What are the severe problems? I agree that the 90% figure is suspect, but they’ll just do more trials to get to the bottom of it.
Logged
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63724
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3448 on: November 27, 2020, 08:21:31 PM »
Quote from: jeremyp on November 27, 2020, 07:46:41 PM
There are no plans to put Union Jacks on doses. Somebody might have suggested it, but clearly the idea was never taken seriously.
Congratulations for agreeing on what was said
« Last Edit: November 28, 2020, 05:24:46 AM by Nearly Sane »
Logged

SteveH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10185
  • God? She's black.
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #3449 on: November 27, 2020, 11:47:48 PM »
Logged
When conspiracy nuts start spouting their bollocks, the best answer is "That's what they want you to think".
Pages: 1 ... 136 137 [138] 139 140 ... 208   Go Up
« previous next »