Just to clarify, and hopefully we can leave , and return to the thread. I offered more than once that I didn't find Corbyn convincing. This wasn't based as such on policy but on the fact that he was not to my mind a good leader. So it proved.
I therefore, apologise, signs are that Starmer is pretty centre-left persuasion and if you more align with him would suggest you are not as far left as Corbyn.
Anyhow, for whatever reason one poster seemed to find it amusing to characterise me as some kind of militant left wing firebrand. Which I decidedly am not. I feel much more comfortable with Starmer as leader as he represents more my particular view of the world.
Again I apologise, I had no idea you thought of Corbyn as a militant left-wing firebrand. I do think of Corbyn, as I previously stated, as more from the extreme left, I didn't think he was militant or much of a firebrand.
That a poster clearly identifies themselves as "right wing thought police" entertains me.
Well that is nice.
Perhaps it will make them more restrained in future when they misrepresent other posters.
No I don't think that follows, I think when engaging with people there is always a chance of misrepresenting them, it is a price you might have to pay to understand them.
