But the logic you claim to know is entirely based upon the time dependent mechanistic "cause and effect" scenario observed within physical activity of material elements.
Why are you yet again totally ignoring the many, many times this has been answered and just repeating the same things over and over again? If you have a response to the answers you've been given countless times before, then why not actually post it instead of doing this mindless repetition that just makes you look like an idiot?
Yet again: our minds, regardless of whether they are physical or not, make choices over periods of time, and if all the factors (internal or external) that exist at the time of the choice do not fully determine the outcome, then some part of the choice must be determined by none of them and therefore be random.
I have made no assumption about minds being physical in that argument.A scenario which totally fails to account for the conscious freedoms we all enjoy.
Baseless assertion. The actual "freedom" to do as we want is, in no way, incompatible with being "inevitable reactions" and the "freedom" you propose is simply nonsensical because it is
self-contradictory.
You consistently ignore the evidence...
You can't just assert something into becoming evidence for something else. You have shown no connection between your nonsensical version of "freedom" and anything we can observe or experience.
...that this reality indicates that our choices are driven from a source which exists and acts in the present, not just reacts to the past.
Mindless repetition of total gibberish.
The source is YOU.
I know - and I see no reason at all why I cannot be a
deterministic system.
Why do you go on with this mindless repetition? You seem to
want to present your faith as if it involves some sort of lobotomy.