Author Topic: Plurality of Britons Would Support Government Censorship of Sexist, Homophobic,  (Read 475 times)


SteveH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10409
  • God? She's black.
Only if it advocates violence or is likely to incite violence should a book be censored. I have read some of the thankfully late and completely unlamented Colin Jordan's scribblings online, including a novella he wrote about a violent fascist revolution in the UK. It was appalling, and I don't just mean literarily, though certainly that. I think it is banned in print form in the UK, but it's near-impossible to ban things from the internet. It certainly should be banned, as it not only fomented hatred towards Jews, blacks, and liberals, it provided useful information for would-be terrorists. I wouldn't want to ban 'The Merchant of Venice', 'Oliver Twist', or some of Doyle's Sherlock Holmes stories, all of which can be accused of anti-semitism, and some of the ACD stories of anti-black prejudice, nor do I think any modern equivalents should be banned, provided they don't advocate violence.
I have a pet termite. His name is Clint. Clint eats wood.

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Only if it advocates violence or is likely to incite violence should a book be censored. I have read some of the thankfully late and completely unlamented Colin Jordan's scribblings online, including a novella he wrote about a violent fascist revolution in the UK. It was appalling, and I don't just mean literarily, though certainly that. I think it is banned in print form in the UK, but it's near-impossible to ban things from the internet. It certainly should be banned, as it not only fomented hatred towards Jews, blacks, and liberals, it provided useful information for would-be terrorists. I wouldn't want to ban 'The Merchant of Venice', 'Oliver Twist', or some of Doyle's Sherlock Holmes stories, all of which can be accused of anti-semitism, and some of the ACD stories of anti-black prejudice, nor do I think any modern equivalents should be banned, provided they don't advocate violence.
 



Wot he said.
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64353
 



Wot he said.
Pretty much, though I think that determining what is 'likely to incite violence' is problematic. It would be very easy to argue that the Bible snd the Qu'ran would fall foul of that given the violence carried out in their name.


The poll itself is just scary.