Vlad,
Unless the impossibility is due to God not existing you are making an antitheistic argument with all the ad homing and muddied water that surrounds that sort, or a ultracalvinist/ultradeterministic
Where there can be non consent, there can be consent.
I’ve schooled you on this already, so why have you returned to the same error?
There is a
story in the Bible. The
story concerns an all-powerful god sending an angelic envoy to a servant girl who was likely underage by today’s standards to tell her that she
would be impregnated by this god.
The same Bible also tells us elsewhere that this god is morally perfect.
That’s the
story remember?
By modern Western standards however this god of the
story could not have acted morally well because the girl could not have given valid consent. She could not have given valid consent not because it’s all just a
story (ie, your mistake) but, with respect to the content of the
story, because of the likely age and relative power dynamics between this god and the girl.
Even if it is all myth (as seems likely), it’s a myth
held up as a moral good whereas it seems to me that, by modern standards, it’s anything but.
Do you get it now?