Yeah, apologies, in seeking to point Udayana in your direction, I overemphasised the initial part of your post and created the wrong impression.
Thanks.
Anyway, let me clarify. If Ian Blackford had simply said he had no obligation to tell the HoC finance people about the lack of auditors and no obligation to tell his successor that the SNP had no auditors, Id have taken his word for it. However, the way he attacked the journalist for even asking the question makes me think that he is not telling the whole truth. He thinks he was wrong to keep it secret. He obviously couldn't tell just his successor before his successor was elected, but he could have told the whole Westminster party.