And no action that Sunak has taken justifies the comment, but sinceyou don't care about lying about Sunak, you'll happily lie about that.
So you don't see any link between chronically underfunding the whole criminal justice system (all the way from police, through courts through to prison) and failures to catch, convict and punish criminals. Hmm, interesting.
Nor that decisions on minimum sentencing (and maximum sentences) rest with parliament and therefore if the party and government that Sunak has been part of for years and now leads had wanted to impose a minimum custodial sentence for convicted child sex offenders they could have done so. Hmm, interesting.
And of course as Chancellor, and now PM, Sunak could have abolished non-dom status, which his family personally benefitted from, and in doing so could have reduced the need to tax others, or increased funding (e.g. for the criminal justice system). But he chose not to.
To govern is to choose, but you cannot then claim that choice wasn't err, your choice, or your intention.
