1. We are made of body, mind, soul.
Ok with mind and body (although in reality both are simply aspects of our physiology and anatomy. But soul - nope. You'll need to demonstrate that such a thing exists before positing some equivalence with body and mind.
2. The body and mind are reflections of the soul.
Given that there is no definitive evidence that the soul is even a thing then this statement is unevidenced non-sense.
3. The soul (individual consciousness) evolves over several lifetimes to develop and increase its level of consciousness.
Ah so now you are redefining things - so the soul is individual consciousness. OK, if that's how you want to define it, but in which case it is a manifestation of our neurophysiology.
Also how can individual conscious evolve over several lifetimes - that makes no sense.
4. While we know broadly how the body works, the mind is still a mystery. It is believed to be made of prana energy and is a part of the biofield.
Nope - we know a lot about how the mind, in reality neurophysiology, works. Sure it is really complex so there is a lot more to know. 'Prana energy', 'biofield' - unevidenced woo.
5. When we die, the body disintegrates, the mind dissipates and the soul travels to different levels of celestial worlds.
6. The individual soul is reborn in different mind-body systems again and again to experience the world.
Yet more unevidenced woo and non-sense. From a fundamental logic point of view how can this be the case when the population is increasing. In that case there would be too many 'new' bodies for the available souls from dead people to populate. You'd need to continually be creating new souls. Alternatively if population decreased you'd need to destroy souls as there wouldn't be enough supply of bodies.
Here is a logical way around this - the mind is a manifestation of the physiology of an individual and when that individual dies so does the mind. Oh and that notion is also supported by the scientific evidence.
7. There is also within us a higher level of consciousness that we can call the spirit (I call it the Higher Self).
8. This Higher Self guides and navigates our spiritual development.
Higher level unevidenced woo.
9. This Higher Self can be experienced as a divine presence from within and is often identified with God.
10. God is generally seen as the highest level of Consciousness from which different levels of consciousness and the world get generated.
Presupposition. Before inserting god into the argument you'll need to demonstrate that god, or gods, actually exist
These are philosophical ideas for which there is evidence in the form of personal experiences, NDE's, documented reincarnation cases, ghost sightings, ESP's and so on.
But as we've pointed out so many times none of these things are supported by any kind of credible evidence.
Religions are cultural and regional creations based on the above basic philosophy....which can be seen as a perennial secular and universal Philosophy.
Some religions are based on those philosophical tenets, but certainly not all. Christianity certainly doesn't seem to be based on the notion of souls being reincarnated in living bodies from generation to generation. Quite the reverse.
But the point about religions (or faiths as we also call them) is that they aren't based on evidence - that's why they are called faiths - you only need faith in a supposition if it lacks evidence in support of it.
