Author Topic: AI facial recognition: Campaigners and MPs call for ban  (Read 509 times)

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64363
AI facial recognition: Campaigners and MPs call for ban
« on: October 06, 2023, 01:51:59 AM »
The ban is more to do with a gut reaction than to any issue with the principle imo. And any ban is going to be window dressing.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-67022005
« Last Edit: October 06, 2023, 03:11:51 AM by Nearly Sane »

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32520
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: AI facial recognition: Campaigners and MPs call for ban
« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2023, 12:46:59 PM »
The ban is more to do with a gut reaction than to any issue with the principle imo. And any ban is going to be window dressing.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-67022005

I really don't think they should be linking it to the passport database.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64363
Re: AI facial recognition: Campaigners and MPs call for ban
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2023, 12:49:06 PM »
I really don't think they should be linking it to the passport database.
Why?

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32520
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: AI facial recognition: Campaigners and MPs call for ban
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2023, 12:50:17 PM »
Why?

Because it means that the police could keep tabs on anybody who has a passport. It's a massive invasion of privacy.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64363
Re: AI facial recognition: Campaigners and MPs call for ban
« Reply #4 on: October 06, 2023, 12:58:18 PM »
Because it means that the police could keep tabs on anybody who has a passport. It's a massive invasion of privacy.
Allowing the access to the database doesn't mean they are keeping tabs on everyone who has a passport. You are objecting to a possible use, not the access itself.

And the proposed ban is far wider than this specific question.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32520
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: AI facial recognition: Campaigners and MPs call for ban
« Reply #5 on: October 06, 2023, 04:24:08 PM »
Allowing the access to the database doesn't mean they are keeping tabs on everyone who has a passport. You are objecting to a possible use, not the access itself.

Damn right I am. I do not trust the police not to use the powers we give them to the fullest extent they can.
Quote
And the proposed ban is far wider than this specific question.

Indeed. It's probably necessary. I'm absolutely fine with the police using facial recognition for finding fugitives and people for whom they have an arrest warrant. No problem with that at all, but what about using facial recognition to monitor anybody who has a criminal record? Is that OK? I don't think so.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64363
Re: AI facial recognition: Campaigners and MPs call for ban
« Reply #6 on: October 06, 2023, 04:36:08 PM »
Damn right I am. I do not trust the police not to use the powers we give them to the fullest extent they can.
Indeed. It's probably necessary. I'm absolutely fine with the police using facial recognition for finding fugitives and people for whom they have an arrest warrant. No problem with that at all, but what about using facial recognition to monitor anybody who has a criminal record? Is that OK? I don't think so.
And again having access to the database in itself doesn't mean that will happen.