I personally don't know what position you hold.
I also don't know what solution you would propose to solve, as much as it could possibly be solved, the ending of the cycle of violence.
Could you enlighten?
Well let's see - the obvious one is that peace is impossible without justice and restitution as required by international law. If you kill or injure civilians by shooting them, burning them, dismembering them, decapitating them either close-up like Hamas or from a distance like Israel or by forcing them off their land or collectively punishing them by starving them, and cutting off water and electricity you are committing acts of terrorism, breaking international law and should be brought to justice. If perpetrators are not held to account there is no reason for the violence to end. So use the intelligence services and technology and soldiers to capture Hamas terrorists and put them on trial; and use travel restrictions, international arrest warrants and cut off funding for arms and settlements to hold members of the Israeli government and the IDF accountable for their terrorism against civilians. George Bush Snr managed to halt settlement building and bring Israel to the negotiating table
https://www.timesofisrael.com/how-lonely-little-george-h-w-bush-changed-the-us-israel-relationship/I've no idea how JP makes the arbitrary distinctions that Hamas indiscriminately punishing civilians is terrorism but when Israel does it, it isn't terrorism just because Israel pays lip service to not wanting to hurt civilians while simultaneously indiscriminately bombing civilian areas.
If states or organisations act outside of international law and some are given a free pass and funded and armed by the international community while others are held to account, the international community itself becomes obstacles to peace. Regional conflicts will inevitably be exported to the international communities as those being discriminated against in terms of funding and arms and the most basic of human rights will try to neutralise this uneven international interference whose foundation is racism and self-interest and which goes against philosophical ideas of natural justice.
Peace is definitely unachievable by the international community continuing down the self-destructive racism, short-term self-interest and colonial mindset route that drew lines on a map and created states in foreign lands to favour one race over another. Very few people seem fooled by the propaganda where people pretend or pay lip service to abstract notions of neutrality, justice or fairness. The non-Western governments are at least more honest about their racism and naked self-interest and corruption.
The international community should stop its one-sided political support for Zionist claims of a right to return. Zionists want to return to a homeland that Jews were expelled from by the Roman Empire almost 2000 years ago. Not surprising then that the Palestinians will have a stronger dream and attachment to return to their homes and land after they were forcibly expelled by Israeli state terrorism only 75 years ago. The Zionists knew they would be fighting the Arabs they forcibly displaced for this land but thought the Palestinians would get old and die and the young would forget, even though the Zionists did not forget after almost 2000 years. Once the Zionists realised the Palestinians were not going to forget, they started using propaganda and lobbying to try to control the narrative and dehumanise the Palestinians. The recent pro-Palestinian demonstrations show that many ordinary people are not fooled or silenced by the propaganda.
In addition, there are many Jews who are horrified by the racism inherent in Zionism and many Palestinians who have no desire to return to their former farmlands, and many people on both sides who are not prepared to pay the price of indiscriminately killing civilians to keep hold of land. So we should ignore the Jewish lobby's attempts to shut down debate by calling it antisemitism. If people are prevented from discussing issues and solving problems through dialogue, they will resort to violence instead, as they have done many times in the past. After all, there are only 2 options available - diplomacy or a cycle of violence. Genocide is not a workable option - too many people to kill and people's beliefs protect them from giving up - if you believe in a cause bigger than yourself such as your nation, your political aspirations, your ancestors and heritage or your god, as humans you are prepared to suffer and die and kill for it.
Pretending that humans do not resort to violence and terrorism when faced with discrimination is wishful thinking and a denial of reality. When we discuss the Holocaust we don't devalue the horror by only looking at the kill rate of one gas chamber in one concentration camp - we form opinions by looking at the total number of deaths and displacements of people by the Nazis. We also don't ignore the context of Europe turning a blind eye to pogroms and the Holocaust or the effects of Palestinian terrorism when discussing what drives Zionist zeal and terrorism. Similarly, we can't overlook the context of international funding of Israeli terrorism during the formation and expansion of Israel, and nor can we ignore the disproportionate number of Palestinians (especially children) killed and displaced by Israel's actions, when discussing what drives militant Palestinian zeal and terrorism.
Ignoring Israeli terrorism sends the message that the international community don't really have a problem with terrorism, and this perpetuates the terrorism on both sides - why would Hamas stop its terrorism and indiscriminate collective punishment of civilians if the international community accepts terrorism as an option by turning a blind eye to Israeli terrorism, and similarly why would Israel stop using the terrorism of indiscriminate, collective, violent punishment on civilians if the international community turns a blind eye to it?
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2021/may/18/a-jewish-case-for-palestinian-refugee-return
