If Starmer meant and acts upon what he said in his speech to the nation, after being formerly declared Prime Minister by The King, he is the right man for the job.
I don't disagree but most of the leaders of main parties might well have said similarly and to act similarly. Indeed, I'm pretty sure Sunak said many of the same things, and leaving aside the distraction of Rwanda used to deal with the bogeyman of Reform, would not really have been trying much different.
He needs luck. He needs some patience from the electorate as nothing is a quick change. I will say that during all of the talk of volatility in the electorate it may give him sometime since the volatility was after the worst govt my life, and 14 years of Tory govt.
I hope that the large majority might allow them to reach put a bit. I wouldn't mind if they appointed Ed Davey onto care in some way. I think they should look at getting agreement with other parties on a way of working with Europe, and they could look to doing some working together on the constitution with the other parties. It might well be worth looking at how England gets represented in terms of a reformed devolved settlement which might address some of the Reform voters concerned, and that might include a loom at voting.
I'd also talk to the opposition parties about how the parliament works with PM questions, committees, work structure. As a small point, I'd have all the subsidy on drinks, and tl an extent food, in the HoP removed.
