Author Topic: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)  (Read 10108 times)

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64111
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #150 on: March 18, 2024, 02:14:51 PM »
AB,

Yes. And when these parts are damaged then the functionality of subconscious and conscious activities is changed or impaired. This is a pretty good indication that these activities are occurring in these parts of the brain. It does not though suggest that an invisible little gremlin called a “soul” is not is only pulling the strings but also selecting different parts of the brain to which it also somehow decides to attach those strings.       
 
But it does explain that different parts of the lived experience emanate from different parts of the brain, which is the point.

...



I think the whole concept of brain damage and abnormalities  is something that causes huge problems for sny idea of a single entity even in materialist terms. Indeed, the idea of a single entity in the terms of consciousness has to be dualist?

(As an aside, the term 'lived experience' just seems tautologous to me)

bluehillside Retd.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19453
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #151 on: March 18, 2024, 02:28:49 PM »
NS,

Quote
I think the whole concept of brain damage and abnormalities  is something that causes huge problems for sny idea of a single entity even in materialist terms. Indeed, the idea of a single entity in the terms of consciousness has to be dualist?

Yes, but they’re informative nonetheless inasmuch as they indicate where various mental functions occur (or cease to occur after the episode). I would go further and say “likely emanate from”, whereas AB for reasons he’s never been able to explain adds a “soul” that presumably therefore selects different parts of the brain to interact with according to which behaviour it’s trying to initiate. Or control. Or something – it’s impossible to know what he thinks about that because his entire case begins and ends “soul” with no supporting detail of any kind.       

Quote
(As an aside, the term 'lived experience' just seems tautologous to me)

I agree, but “different parts of experience” seem to be missing something somehow. I’ll try to do better next time though. 
"Don't make me come down there."

God

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64111
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #152 on: March 18, 2024, 02:46:07 PM »
NS,

Yes, but they’re informative nonetheless inasmuch as they indicate where various mental functions occur (or cease to occur after the episode). I would go further and say “likely emanate from”, whereas AB for reasons he’s never been able to explain adds a “soul” that presumably therefore selects different parts of the brain to interact with according to which behaviour it’s trying to initiate. Or control. Or something – it’s impossible to know what he thinks about that because his entire case begins and ends “soul” with no supporting detail of any kind.       

I agree, but “different parts of experience” seem to be missing something somehow. I’ll try to do better next time though.
As should I, since I obviously didn't make clear thar brain damage and abnormalities seem to me yo be good evidence for a materialist approach, as well as damaging to the idea of a seperate entity.

In terms of damage, I often think of Phineas Gage, and split brain syndrome here but there are many other examples.

Sriram

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8253
    • Spirituality & Science
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #153 on: March 19, 2024, 05:13:40 AM »


Why should brain damage and such things imply a materialistic source to consciousness? If you are sitting inside a robot under the sea, any damage to the robot or its circuits or software, would naturally affect your vision through ts cameras, its movement, hearing through its microphones etc. That does not mean you as a person don't exist independent of the robot.

It is important to realize that by consciousness we mean not just wakeful awareness but also the unconscious mind which is a much larger and more powerful component compared to wakeful consciousness.     

torridon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10208
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #154 on: March 19, 2024, 06:48:05 AM »

Why should brain damage and such things imply a materialistic source to consciousness? If you are sitting inside a robot under the sea, any damage to the robot or its circuits or software, would naturally affect your vision through ts cameras, its movement, hearing through its microphones etc. That does not mean you as a person don't exist independent of the robot.
 

The idea of a person inside the robot watching the camera feed has long been debunked not just because of the evidence (or lack of it) but in logical terms as it implies an infinite regress of inner homonculae needed to perceive what the outer guy is perceiving.

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33166
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #155 on: March 19, 2024, 09:18:40 AM »
The idea of a person inside the robot watching the camera feed has long been debunked not just because of the evidence (or lack of it) but in logical terms as it implies an infinite regress of inner homonculae needed to perceive what the outer guy is perceiving.
Cue Intervention by those who advocate an infinite regress to explain the universe...

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33166
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #156 on: March 19, 2024, 09:41:54 AM »
Come on chaps....

bluehillside Retd.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19453
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #157 on: March 19, 2024, 10:28:09 AM »
Sriram,

Quote
Why should brain damage and such things imply a materialistic source to consciousness? If you are sitting inside a robot under the sea, any damage to the robot or its circuits or software, would naturally affect your vision through ts cameras, its movement, hearing through its microphones etc. That does not mean you as a person don't exist independent of the robot.

It is important to realize that by consciousness we mean not just wakeful awareness but also the unconscious mind which is a much larger and more powerful component compared to wakeful consciousness.

Pain is defined as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage. The mechanism by which a damaging stimulus in the body is perceived as painful by the brain is a complex one which is not yet fully understood.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534269/#:~:text=Pain%20is%20defined%20as%20an,actual%20or%20potential%20tissue%20damage.&text=The%20mechanism%20by%20which%20a,is%20not%20yet%20fully%20understood.

When my friend had crippling stomach pain that stopped when his gallstones were removed was it a reasonable working hypothesis that:

i.  The gallstones caused the pain even though the phenomenon of pain is not yet fully understood; or

ii. There is a universal property of pain just floating about the place that lampposts and rocks experience too, and that somehow decides to attach itself to gallstones?

I assume you’d opt for i., yet with no greater evidence for it you'd opt for ii. when “pain” is replaced with “consciousness”. But for your a priori superstitious beliefs, why would you do that? 
« Last Edit: March 19, 2024, 10:34:49 AM by bluehillside Retd. »
"Don't make me come down there."

God

bluehillside Retd.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19453
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #158 on: March 19, 2024, 10:32:09 AM »
Vlad,

Quote
Cue Intervention by those who advocate an infinite regress to explain the universe...

No-one has done that.

Quote
Come on chaps....

What are you asking people to defend your straw man?
"Don't make me come down there."

God

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32414
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #159 on: March 19, 2024, 11:41:45 AM »

Why should brain damage and such things imply a materialistic source to consciousness? If you are sitting inside a robot under the sea, any damage to the robot or its circuits or software, would naturally affect your vision through ts cameras, its movement, hearing through its microphones etc. That does not mean you as a person don't exist independent of the robot.


We are not talking about damage to our sensory organs, we are talking about damage to our brains.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64111
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #160 on: March 19, 2024, 11:57:48 AM »

Why should brain damage and such things imply a materialistic source to consciousness? If you are sitting inside a robot under the sea, any damage to the robot or its circuits or software, would naturally affect your vision through ts cameras, its movement, hearing through its microphones etc. That does not mean you as a person don't exist independent of the robot.

It is important to realize that by consciousness we mean not just wakeful awareness but also the unconscious mind which is a much larger and more powerful component compared to wakeful consciousness.   
Because brain damage and abnormalitirs seem tk affect the personality. See Phineas Gage

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phineas_Gage


And look at split brain syndrome effects
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Split-brain

Anyone who has had contact with people with dementia will also likely see affects.


If the entity is independent, that shouldn't change.


Note you also switch between talking about independent entities and there being only one consciousness. This seems contradictory.

Outrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14550
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #161 on: March 19, 2024, 12:08:53 PM »
Cue Intervention by those who advocate an infinite regress to explain the universe...

Cue non sequitur by someone who totally has a cogent argument against the notion of an infinite regress somewhere around here...

O.
Universes are forever, not just for creation...

New Atheism - because, apparently, there's a use-by date on unanswered questions.

Eminent Pedant, Interpreter of Heretical Writings, Unwarranted Harvester of Trite Nomenclature, Church of Debatable Saints

Sriram

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8253
    • Spirituality & Science
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #162 on: March 19, 2024, 12:14:06 PM »


It is obviously more complicated than that. 

Consciousness exists independently of the body/brain but it projects itself into the Personality through the mind. That is why when the Personalty (body) gets damaged the mind also gets affected. The mind incidentally, is different from consciousness.   

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32414
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #163 on: March 19, 2024, 12:15:13 PM »

It is obviously more complicated than that. 

Consciousness exists independently of the body/brain but it projects itself into the Personality through the mind. That is why when the Personalty (body) gets damaged the mind also gets affected. The mind incidentally, is different from consciousness.   

How do you explain dementia then?
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Sriram

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8253
    • Spirituality & Science
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #164 on: March 19, 2024, 12:22:17 PM »



The mind is the interface between consciousness and the physical world.  Dementia is a problem with the brain/mind (hardware/software). Obviously if the interface is affected, communication and interactions with the world will get affected.

bluehillside Retd.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19453
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #165 on: March 19, 2024, 12:31:44 PM »
Sriram,

Quote
It is obviously more complicated than that.

Not in principle it isn’t. Why do you think otherwise – other that is than just asserting it to be so?

Quote
Consciousness exists independently of the body/brain but it projects itself into the Personality through the mind.

So now you’re asserting there to be consciousness somehow just floating about the place that when the mood takes it decides to “project” itself onto minds. And your evidence-denying grounds for that remarkable claim would be what exactly?   

Quote
That is why when the Personalty (body) gets damaged the mind also gets affected. The mind incidentally, is different from consciousness.

Perhaps it would help if you started by telling us what you think the difference between the mind and personality to be maybe supported with some citations to academic research into this matter, or at least by some reasoned grounds rather than unqualified guesses and assertions? 

Or are we supposed just to take your word for it? 
"Don't make me come down there."

God

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32414
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #166 on: March 19, 2024, 12:32:42 PM »


The mind is the interface between consciousness and the physical world.  Dementia is a problem with the brain/mind (hardware/software). Obviously if the interface is affected, communication and interactions with the world will get affected.

Have you never had a loved one or a friend with dementia? My friend got somewhat distressed when her father couldn't recognise her anymore, or recall that he had a daughter. This is more than just a communication issue.

I'm sure that I could find some form of brain damage that will affect just about any aspect of consciousness. If every part of consciousness is dependent on the brain in one way or another, what reason could there be for pretending that any of it is separate from the brain?
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Maeght

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5675
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #167 on: March 19, 2024, 12:35:20 PM »

It is obviously more complicated than that. 

Consciousness exists independently of the body/brain but it projects itself into the Personality through the mind. That is why when the Personalty (body) gets damaged the mind also gets affected. The mind incidentally, is different from consciousness.   

That's not obvious at all.

Outrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14550
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #168 on: March 19, 2024, 12:36:18 PM »
It is obviously more complicated than that.

Given that we don't have a complete explanation, you mean? 

Quote
Consciousness exists independently of the body/brain but it projects itself into the Personality through the mind.

You can assert that, but you need to justify the claim. Why do you think consciousness is separate from the physical body?

Quote
That is why when the Personalty (body) gets damaged the mind also gets affected.

It's not inconsistent with your claim, but it's not inconsistent with the materialist explanation, either.

Quote
The mind incidentally, is different from consciousness.

I don't know that anyone's arguing against that, although there are probably a number of us who would contest with you what your suggestion is for the reason why.

O.
Universes are forever, not just for creation...

New Atheism - because, apparently, there's a use-by date on unanswered questions.

Eminent Pedant, Interpreter of Heretical Writings, Unwarranted Harvester of Trite Nomenclature, Church of Debatable Saints

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64111
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #169 on: March 19, 2024, 12:44:06 PM »


The mind is the interface between consciousness and the physical world.  Dementia is a problem with the brain/mind (hardware/software). Obviously if the interface is affected, communication and interactions with the world will get affected.
This reads as if you've never dealt with anyone with dementia. It's not just forgetfullness.
« Last Edit: March 19, 2024, 12:48:59 PM by Nearly Sane »

Sriram

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8253
    • Spirituality & Science
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #170 on: March 19, 2024, 12:54:09 PM »



If the mind is the interface between consciousness and the physical world, naturally all interactions and behaviors will be affected in a person with dementia.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64111
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #171 on: March 19, 2024, 01:12:37 PM »


If the mind is the interface between consciousness and the physical world, naturally all interactions and behaviors will be affected in a person with dementia.
Including what appears to be personality? Why would that happen if the entity is seperate from the brain. Given that it does happen with damage to the brain, see earlier mention of Phineas Gage, and split brain syndrome, that argues that there is no seperate entity. 

Outrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14550
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #172 on: March 19, 2024, 01:19:22 PM »
If the mind is the interface between consciousness and the physical world, naturally all interactions and behaviors will be affected in a person with dementia.

What do you suggest would be the difference between a consciousness produced by material activity in a body, and consciousness imparted onto a physical body by some non-physical source?

O.
Universes are forever, not just for creation...

New Atheism - because, apparently, there's a use-by date on unanswered questions.

Eminent Pedant, Interpreter of Heretical Writings, Unwarranted Harvester of Trite Nomenclature, Church of Debatable Saints

Sriram

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8253
    • Spirituality & Science
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #173 on: March 19, 2024, 01:35:43 PM »


https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/understanding-grief/202311/terminal-lucidity-and-the-near-death-experience

********

An NDE occurs when a person is close to death or pronounced dead. It is often triggered by a medical trauma such as a car accident, heart attack, etc. Typically, there is an out-of-body experience: The individual viewing themselves from above, traveling through a tunnel, seeing vivid imagery, encountering deceased family members, and bright lights, and perhaps perceiving angelic-like beings. The person is often told that it is not their time to die and returns to life. Terminal lucidity occurs more often when someone who is close to death and has been uncommunicative and unresponsive—as in the late stages of dementia—becomes alert, lucid, and verbal at the end of their life. It is as though the old self has returned after all have assumed the “self” has been destroyed. Sadly, it is followed closely by death.

They go against everything we know so far about death and dying, and yet these events are well documented. It seems that initially when the near-death experiences were brought to the public’s attention, they were dismissed as delusions, wishful thinking, or simply lies. Professionals did not deem them worthy of research and criticized those who did. Today, NDEs are more widely accepted as phenomena that can occur when someone is dying. With increased public and professional acceptance, people are more willing to share their experiences without fear of ridicule. Recognition of terminal lucidity is still in its early stages;

In exploring these end-of-life experiences, many questions arise: Is the mind separate from the brain? Where was the former self during the time that the person was “away?" Was it hibernating or preserved somewhere? Do changes in neurochemical transmitters trigger the experience? What implications does this have for the treatment of Alzheimer's or dementia? Do both TL and NDE suggest that there may be more to us than our biological self? What can we learn from these experiences about consciousness?

*********

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64111
Re: Recalled Experience of Death (RED)
« Reply #174 on: March 19, 2024, 01:41:56 PM »

https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/understanding-grief/202311/terminal-lucidity-and-the-near-death-experience

********

An NDE occurs when a person is close to death or pronounced dead. It is often triggered by a medical trauma such as a car accident, heart attack, etc. Typically, there is an out-of-body experience: The individual viewing themselves from above, traveling through a tunnel, seeing vivid imagery, encountering deceased family members, and bright lights, and perhaps perceiving angelic-like beings. The person is often told that it is not their time to die and returns to life. Terminal lucidity occurs more often when someone who is close to death and has been uncommunicative and unresponsive—as in the late stages of dementia—becomes alert, lucid, and verbal at the end of their life. It is as though the old self has returned after all have assumed the “self” has been destroyed. Sadly, it is followed closely by death.

They go against everything we know so far about death and dying, and yet these events are well documented. It seems that initially when the near-death experiences were brought to the public’s attention, they were dismissed as delusions, wishful thinking, or simply lies. Professionals did not deem them worthy of research and criticized those who did. Today, NDEs are more widely accepted as phenomena that can occur when someone is dying. With increased public and professional acceptance, people are more willing to share their experiences without fear of ridicule. Recognition of terminal lucidity is still in its early stages;

In exploring these end-of-life experiences, many questions arise: Is the mind separate from the brain? Where was the former self during the time that the person was “away?" Was it hibernating or preserved somewhere? Do changes in neurochemical transmitters trigger the experience? What implications does this have for the treatment of Alzheimer's or dementia? Do both TL and NDE suggest that there may be more to us than our biological self? What can we learn from these experiences about consciousness?

*********
All of which shows no clarity of thought around dementia, or other examples of brain damage and abnormality in that it ignores the effects of dementia in terms of the 'entity' existing seperately from the brain.