I have presented the views of Sam Parnia and the RED phenomenon.
And we've reviewed it, and it's unconvincing at best.
I have also linked about the many reasons to believe that the mind is different from the brain.
No, you've explained some things about how that would work if it were the case, but I've not seen anything that qualifies as a reason why anyone should think that it is the case.
I have also linked videos of prominent neuroscientists expressing their views about why consciousness cannot be just neural activity.
And yet the very nature of neuroscience presumes that it is; there may well be some neuroscientists who, when they take off their lab-coats, believe in souls, but that's not part of their work. And it's not a logical conclusion, or a conclusion from the evidence, that's at all widely accepted in the field of neuroscience.
Your mental programming just does not allow you to see the reality that is quite clear to many others.
Or, conversely, your mental programming has integrated this delusion, and you keep attempting to wedge it into phenomena that don't need it. See, I can throw an
ad hominem in place of an argument, too.
The only thing that is left for you people is to take up yoga and meditations and look into your own self and subjective nature and see the reality for yourselves on a first person basis.
Ah, personal revelation - another
ad hominem, cloaked in mystic bullshit. "You'd understand if only you'd meditate properly, it's a personal failing on your part'. If you can't explain it, if you can't understand it without - by your own admission - entering some sort of altered mental state, maybe it's not real.
And I meditate fine, thank you - wood-turning videos on YouTube are disturbingly calming for me.
I however know that is not going to happen.
You don't 'know', but you strongly suspect, just as I strongly suspect that you'll cling to this belief in souls in the absolute absence of any reason to do so.
O.