What is fundamental?
Exactly. You tell me, you're the one that seems to feel a need for them.
Well, Science talks of fundamental particles
Within the context of our material universe, yes. Outwith of that, at the moment, science has very little to say and what it does have to say is unapologetically hypothetical
So are you now going to introduce yet another infinity to cover your embarrassment?
What embarressment would that be?
Can you deny suspending cause and effect,
Suspending it? I'm expanding on the possibility of it being inviolate. You're suggesting an uncaused cause, I'm suggesting an infinite chain of cause and effect - what sort of defect of cognition do you have to have to parse that into the one of us that's suspending cause and effect being me?
reason and ignoring the issues raised by infinities and circularities in order to avoid a necessary entity?
Yes, yes I can deny that, thanks for asking. Of course, it's easy to deny on the same basis you've asserted it, which is to say none. If you want to suggest there's a flaw in the reasoning you need to show what that flaw is, not just claim that it's there. If you want to suggest that I've overlooked some issues raised by infinities and circularities you need to elucidate upon what those might be.
I’m not sure you can.
That's OK, at the moment I'm quite sure I don't need to.
O.