But you’ve already acknowledged that humans do moral wrong, that human innocence is not a thing.
Humans are not perfect. The moral problem is that your God expects perfection from its imperfect creation. Whether that's due to 'original sin' or not, doesn't matter, it's still stupid, cruel, and unjust.
Now, If you believe that some will get away with it and that you can get away with it doesn’t that favour a moral approach where not getting caught is paramount since that moral landscape is the most real to you? What on earth is it that keeps you believing in justice. What is your benchmark?
What are you going on about now? According to your fairytale, all we have to do to get away with anything, is believe in your insane immoral, unjust God, and it's absurd substitute blood pseudo-sacrifice.
Piss easy if you're world-class at suspending disbelief, not so easy if you value morality and logic.
That could be fence squatting, God dodging or antitheism.
Now you've just taken what I said out of its context to go off into one of your favourite fantasies.
Celebrity atheist Alex zo’connor is fond of mentioning the legions who wouldn’t follow God even if they knew he existed.
Given how bloodthirsty and immoral it would be if all this was true, I'd be one of them, for this version of God.
As an agnostic you don’t have the luxury of the impossibility of God.....If you are agnostic.
Some versions of God are impossible simply because they are self-contradictory. You describe your God as good and just, and yet you believe the "Jesus died for our sins" bollocks. Those claims contradict each other.