Fuck knows. It's hard enough to detect exoplanets at all, which is why most of the ones we've found are considerably larger than Earth. However, since most of the planets in our solar system have at least one moon, it seems likely.
Ever thought of referencing your sources?
Regardless, although the moon is vital to the exact ecosystem we have on Earth I've never seen a detailed claim that life would be impossible without one.
We seem to be getting close to the Douglas Adams puddle analogy:
"This is rather as if you imagine a puddle waking up one morning and thinking, 'This is an interesting world I find myself in - an interesting hole I find myself in - fits me rather neatly, doesn't it? In fact it fits me staggeringly well, must have been made to have me in it!'"
Dear Stranger Good Morning.
Referencing my sources!
Well here is Wiki jam packed with referencing my sources.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant-impact_hypothesisBut that is not the question I have this morning, wiki versus AI ?Why because you asked me for references, who do I trust, and my conclusion so far is AI, I trust a damn computer more than a human, oh dear!
Do computers lie, am I asking the right questions, who developed the AI I am using, in the end I am left with, I trust myself, I have at my disposal the greatest computer ever developed, so have you, but the damn thing is flawed, but I suppose that is the beauty of science, scientists take a theory/hypothesis/guess and put it through the mill if it stands the test of time it makes its way into main stream thinking.
Anyway, to end, if I post scientific stuff, it is the ramblings of a computer, I have simply asked a question, is it the right question, who knows, only the Shadow knows😮
Sorry to end end
more computer ramblings.
The "lazy brain theory" suggests our brains are wired to conserve energy and effort, relying on shortcuts and mental heuristics to make decisions quickly, which can lead to biases and irrationality.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
Energy Conservation:
The brain prioritizes minimizing effort and maximizing efficiency, a strategy that evolved to help our ancestors survive by conserving resources.
Heuristics and Biases:
To achieve this, the brain uses mental shortcuts (heuristics) and relies on pre-existing knowledge and biases to make quick decisions.
Implications for Decision-Making:
This "laziness" can lead to snap judgments, confirmation bias (favoring information that confirms existing beliefs), and resistance to new ideas or information that requires more effort to process.
Examples:
The Dress: The famous "dress" online phenomenon, where people perceived the color differently, highlights how the brain can rely on visual shortcuts and biases.
Resisting New Ideas: People may resist new ideas or innovations because the brain finds it easier to stick to familiar patterns and avoid the effort of processing something new.
Lazy-Brain Labeling: The tendency to label others with "lazy-brain" thinking can lead to division and a lack of empathy, as it can be a shortcut to understanding complex situations.
Overcoming Lazy Thinking:
To counter the "lazy brain," it's important to actively engage in critical thinking, challenge our biases, and seek out diverse perspectives.
The Role of AI:
The rise of AI and language models (LLMs) raises concerns about whether we are becoming too reliant on technology to do the thinking for us, potentially further hindering our cognitive abilities.
Guilty yer honour on all counts, and you have mentioned this before "critical thinking" but then I am a lazy bar steward 
Gonnagle.
